Research 04 — Attention & Context

The Invisible Cost of Starting Over

Why losing your train of thought is more expensive than you think.

Abstract coral, pink, violet and blue ripples dissolving into a fine halftone texture.
All research

We don't just lose time. We lose context.

You're working on something important.

An idea is taking shape. You're making progress. You finally know what needs to happen next.

Then a message arrives.

You answer it. Open another tab. Remember something unrelated. Maybe attend a meeting.

Twenty minutes later, you return.

The document is still there. Your notes haven't moved. Everything looks exactly as you left it.

Except your train of thought.

You remember what you were doing, but not necessarily what you were about to do.

And suddenly, continuing requires starting again.

Why?

The science of interrupted attention

In 2009, researcher Sophie Leroy published a study investigating what happens when people move between different work tasks.

She identified a phenomenon called attention residue.

When we switch away from a task, especially an unfinished one, part of our attention may remain occupied by it.

We can be physically present in the next activity while mentally processing the previous one.

Across two experiments, the research showed how difficulty disengaging from an earlier task could interfere with performance on the next.

This challenges a common assumption: switching activities doesn't necessarily mean our attention has switched completely.

The importance of knowing how to return

A later study, published in Organization Science in 2018, explored something particularly interesting.

Researchers Sophie Leroy and Theresa M. Glomb examined whether a brief plan for returning to interrupted work could help people manage attention.

Across four studies, they found support for a simple intervention: before switching away, briefly consider how you will resume the unfinished task.

This approach reduced attention residue under the conditions studied.

The finding raises an intriguing possibility.

What if our software helped us remember not just what we were doing, but how to continue?

Better interfaces could make a difference.

The challenge isn't only psychological. It's also a question of design.

In a 2025 experimental study published in the International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, researchers examined how interface complexity and contextual guidance affected task recovery after interruptions.

In their laboratory tasks, more complex interfaces increased the time and effort associated with resuming work. Clear contextual guidance helped participants return more quickly and reduced selection errors.

The experiment involved 25 participants in controlled tasks, so its findings shouldn't be treated as proof of what will happen in every real-world workspace.

Still, it provides a useful direction for further investigation.

Perhaps the next generation of digital tools should spend less effort displaying everything and more effort helping us find what matters next.

What we're exploring at ThinkMessy

Most productivity tools are designed around information.

Documents. Notes. Tasks. Projects.

But a person's work also contains something harder to capture: context.

Why did you start this project?

What were you trying to solve?

Which decision were you considering?

What were you planning to do next?

We're exploring how AI could help preserve this context without requiring people to manually document every step.

Introducing the concept: Resume My Flow

Imagine opening ThinkMessy after being away from a project for three days.

Instead of searching through old notes, the interface could provide a short summary:

No complicated dashboard.

No need to reconstruct an entire conversation.

Just enough context to continue.

The system could also link back to the original notes, allowing you to verify or change the suggested next step.

This is an early product concept, not a released feature or a scientifically validated intervention.

The questions that matter

Before building such a system, important questions remain.

Can AI accurately identify the context of unfinished work?

What information should be remembered, and what should be forgotten?

Can a short summary make it easier to resume a project without removing important details?

How much control should users have over what the system remembers?

We believe answering these questions requires more than sophisticated AI models.

It requires thoughtful design, privacy safeguards, and testing with real people.

A future with less starting over

We can't remove every interruption from modern life.

Nor should we.

People need breaks. Priorities change. Unexpected things happen.

But losing the thread of our work shouldn't always mean rebuilding it from scratch.

At ThinkMessy, we're exploring a future where technology helps people maintain continuity between their thoughts, intentions, and actions.

Because progress shouldn't disappear every time your attention moves somewhere else.

Scientific references

  1. Leroy, S. (2009).

    Why Is It So Hard to Do My Work? The Challenge of Attention Residue When Switching Between Work Tasks.

    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 168–181.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.04.002
  2. Leroy, S., & Glomb, T. M. (2018).

    Tasks Interrupted: How Anticipating Time Pressure on Resumption of an Interrupted Task Causes Attention Residue and Low Performance on Interrupting Tasks and How a “Ready-to-Resume” Plan Mitigates the Effects.

    Organization Science, 29(3), 380–397.

    https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1184
  3. Zhang, C., et al. (2025).

    The Influence of Interface Attributes and Interaction Elements on User Performance and Cognitive Load in Task Interruption Scenarios.

    International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 108, 103761.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103761

Research explained by ThinkMessy