Research 01 — Creativity

Why Great Ideas Start Messy

The science behind creative thinking — and why structure shouldn't always come first.

Abstract orange, coral and turquoise gradients with a fine halftone texture.
All research

Creativity rarely begins with a perfect plan.

A thought appears. Then another. An unexpected connection leads somewhere new. Soon, there are fragments of ideas, unanswered questions, half-written sentences, and possibilities that don't quite fit together.

From the outside, this can look like disorder.

But creativity isn't always a linear process. Research suggests it involves an ongoing interaction between generating ideas and evaluating them.

The challenge is knowing when to explore and when to organize.

What the research tells us

In 2019, researchers Oded M. Kleinmintz, Tal Ivancovsky, and Simone G. Shamay-Tsoory published a review examining the neural foundations of creative thinking.

Their two-fold model describes two interconnected processes:

1. Idea generation

This is the exploratory stage. The mind searches for unusual associations, combines existing knowledge, and considers possibilities that may initially seem impractical.

2. Idea evaluation

This is where ideas are assessed, selected, and refined. The researchers describe evaluation as involving valuation, monitoring, and selection.

Importantly, these processes can alternate throughout creative work. Creativity doesn't require abandoning critical thinking. It requires finding a productive relationship between exploration and judgment.

The review also highlights evidence that overly stringent evaluation can interfere with divergent thinking — the ability to explore multiple possibilities.

The problem with organizing too early

Imagine writing down a new business idea.

Before you've explored it, you begin deciding categories, priorities, timelines, and execution details.

Those decisions can be useful. But they may also shift your attention away from discovering new possibilities.

This creates an important design question:

What if capturing an idea didn't require you to organize it immediately?

A system could allow people to express incomplete thoughts first and introduce structure when they are ready to move forward.

From messy thinking to meaningful action

The implication isn't that disorder automatically produces better ideas.

It's that generating ideas and organizing them serve different purposes.

A thoughtful creative workflow can make room for both.

Capture without unnecessary friction. Explore connections. Evaluate possibilities. Then turn promising thoughts into concrete steps.

This principle is central to the vision behind ThinkMessy: give ideas room to develop before requiring them to fit into a structure.

The takeaway

Your first thought doesn't need to be your final structure.

Creativity involves both exploration and evaluation. A useful workspace should support the transition between them, rather than forcing every idea to arrive fully formed.

Scientific reference

  1. Kleinmintz, O. M., Ivancovsky, T., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2019).

    The two-fold model of creativity: The neural underpinnings of the generation and evaluation of creative ideas.

    Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 131–138.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.11.004

Research explained by ThinkMessy